Definition: When they heard these things, they were cut to the heart, and they gnashed on him with [their] teeth.

Explanation: Okay, let’s break down this passage from Acts 7:54. It’s a really powerful and dramatic scene. Here's what it means in simpler terms: The Core of the Verse: When God speaks to Moses, he is deeply hurt and angered by his disobedience. He says, “When they hear these things, they were cut to the heart, and they gnashed on him with [their] teeth.” Let’s unpack it piece by piece: “When they heard these things…” – This refers to a specific event – perhaps a particular act of rebellion or disobedience. It's not just any hearing; it’s a significant and painful one. “…they were cut to the heart…” - This is metaphorical. “Cutting to the heart” means deeply upsetting, causing immense pain and sorrow. It suggests something was profoundly wrong and devastating. Think of it like a wound that bleeds. "...and they gnashed on him with [their] teeth.” – This is a really striking image. “Gnashing” means to clench or bite angrily. “With their teeth” emphasizes the intensity of this anger and resentment. It’s as if they were trying to physically lash out at God with their fury. What does it all mean? This verse paints a picture of intense, visceral anger and hostility against God. It suggests: God's Pain: The verse highlights that God is deeply wounded by this transgression. Disbelief & Rebellion: It points to a significant shift in the people’s faith – they are rejecting God’s authority and accusing him of wrongdoing. A Powerful Reaction: The word "gnashed" shows a furious, almost violent reaction, demonstrating their intense anger. In essence, it's a dramatic representation of God’s pain and a reflection of the people's rejection of his message. --- Important Note: This is a challenging verse for many readers because it depicts such strong emotion. It’s often interpreted as a sign of deep spiritual crisis within the Jewish community at the time. Do you want me to: Explain this verse in more detail? Discuss the historical context surrounding this passage? Provide different possible interpretations of what it means?